nehruviana The decline in the age that saw the family as the first President of India independent, Jawaharlal Nehru, to rule the Indian subcontinent from 1947 to 1989, coincided with another major global event: the fall of the Berlin Wall. From then on there was, in India as in many parts of the globe, winning the affirmation of neoliberal policies "socialism." The economy has now established itself in the Indian subcontinent characterized by strong private presence, and Hinduism is no longer a simple political distinctiveness of the company as before, but a real project to unify its members and discriminate against outsiders. The Indian political system can no longer, as before 1996, to govern according to party dominant alliances are programmed to defeat their opponents. Smaller parties have become increasingly important over time and facilitated the exponential growth of two types: those in local, and those representing the interests of caste. This trend can be considered as one of the typical consequences of the process of globalization. In a context as complex as confused, they tend to favor those parties of particular interests and not the huge cauldrons bureaucracy. In the last elections a few months ago is the historical party of Mahatma Gandhi, the Congress, the Hindu fundamentalist party, the BJP lost acclaim at the expense of much smaller parties, especially to those on the left. The electorate, often de-politicized in the classic sense of ideological opposition, tries as much as possible to protect or improve their position through the election of representatives of the same social category. Expression of this particular trend has also been the formation of a bearer party of the interests of caste, the untouchables, who even today can boast the presidency of the lower house (the Lok Sahba) with the first woman in the history of the subcontinent to take on this assignment, Meira Kumar. Such developments led to three main consequences: the proliferation of governments and their instability, heterogeneity of the majority, made up of different interest groups, and the rise of regional parties, which have gained considerable weight to the life of the Governments themselves. Since the elections of 1996 onwards, government coalitions are no longer monochromatic, as in the past, but meet all three characteristics mentioned above. The evolution worst since independence party today is certainly that of Congress, a British weekly that has defined as "a set of thieves and sycophants." With the death of the historic leader Nehru, there was a gradual process in the party ideologically empty, finally ending with the final sunset nehruviana age and death of his grandson Rajiv. The prestige of the families they belong, in India and in Burma and other countries, is a real political pass. If tradition is strong kinship, an unknown character can be a candidate in the highest offices of state is' This is the origin of the candidacy of Sonia Gandhi, but even in the last election was particularly excited to lead the country, and left as before the assignment to Manmohan Singh. In a policy framework has become more unstable governments that have occurred over the years have become increasingly distanced from the socialist model that Nehru had so hoped for, and have in fact made manifest what was happening globally with the fall of the Berlin Wall: the yield of socialism in favor of the liberal model. The anomaly is that the Indian political system as it was spread throughout the world, the temptation of the Left parties to be conniving with the galloping new economic model, in India they have become among its most enthusiastic supporters. In the crucial years for the final burial of socialism of Nehru, all those Indian politicians seem to marry the new doctrine, even the leader of the Bengali communists Joyty Basu has been spent around the world to convince big business to invest in the subcontinent. There is no doubt on the results of this new approach: India's GDP grew by 6-7% per annum and the IT sector world has become a beacon, but we are talking about the economy, if you talk about quality of life data would be very different. Even now, as then, it seems there are many benefits for that 33% of the population which, according to official statistics also do not have the minimum economic enough to prevent malnutrition. The discrepancy was determined to eradicate social Nehru is ongoing. The policies we are able to advance economically in the entire subcontinent, but are able to ensure greater equity and social justice? The logic of profit is universal and therefore valid in India as in all other parts of the world, but the situation in India is a paradox because if its economy, despite today's economic crisis continues to be highly developed, the same can not be said of his level of welfare. E 'in India perhaps more than anyone else that feels the most important question of this, and' this can really be called development? elections a few months ago, seeing they reaffirmed the alliance government headed by Manmohan Singh, has seen a significant step forward for the Left parties who more than anyone in recent years have pressed the government to criticism on social issues. Evidently, as yet absolutely stable as a template, the freedom of India begins to suffer strokes of light from below. The bands weakest of the population seem to awaken from the myth of the "American dream" and realize that despite the numbers describe a country continues to rise, his condition is stable, if not terribly worse.
The lack of response to policy is also part of private law so invasive that they have taken place in a real beacon of civilization in the subcontinent, or in the functioning of caste. These absolutely unique in the world, live on a vertical hierarchy, inclusive, or for how deeply unequal ii tends to include all members in a collective based on mutual need. The logic of caste superiority by birth and then, well she married a certain acceptance of the status of poverty. However, with steps such as election as president of the Lower House of Meira Kumar, is easy to predict that the categories poor start to ask themselves increasingly doubt that their condition is not fully written, and therefore not legitimate. This awareness, if it became effective, would throw the country into chaos. Only a sound policy, not only to give signals, but also to decipher those in place, will help to avoid dangerous tensions grow, and meet the demands of equality that comes from many segments of society. The country that became the seed of a new and revolutionary thought which Gandhism, is now in position of having to choose whether to permanently solve its social discrepancies before they explode, or to continue to ignore them and think instead of a total accumulation without regard to its spatial distribution. The models, as cost-effective, can never persist over time if not recognized as the most fair for the community., Especially in a global context where the tensions between different groups (both for religion and for different economic status) is continuing growing. India will be the bearer of a message. Must demonstrate that it is possible to combine economic growth with the increased quality of life. That should become as it did in the past, the guidance of a "third position" mind you that the economic values \u200b\u200bwithout forgetting that, though timidly, albeit quietly, behind them there are people. 
0 comments:
Post a Comment