in the West often overestimates the figure of Ahmadinejad, many believe it is a kind of denial devil with the intention of giving atomic bomb in the scheme. In reality, Ahmadinejad is not much more than a form of Supreme Leader Khamenei and the Council of Sages. They are the ones who actually handle the power and most often start off on the reasoning of the Iranian leader. The Khomeini revolution of 1979 overthrew the Persian monarchy of the Shah with the help of Islamic and mujaiheddin fedayyin (volunteers of the people of Marxist-inspired), but the men were slowly taking control of the fight against the monarch's self-sufficiency, allowing them to impose the birth of the Islamic Republic. Although the Constitution it established the creation of two separate powers, namely the political of the President of the Republic and parliament and the religious supreme leader, is to the latter which in fact had formed part of the real powers. This framework is critical to understand how the tensions within Iran are not the result of Ahmadinejad, but the product of twenty years of religious oppression. The control of the Supreme Leader is not exercised only by law in the adoption of Islamic precepts, but also to prohibit even the nominations of members too far away from Islam in the presidential election, and thus the possibility of prior censorship by Khamenei. And 'This is the meaning of the clashes that are precipitated by the hour, the Shiite Republic in chaos. Ahmadinejad says that behind the riots of these days there is a long arm and American English. E 'plausible that the governments in Washington London and do everything possible to destabilize the regime and give it the shove that fact would change the tables in world relations, but this does not mean that the protests in Tehran are brought from abroad. The Iranians suffer from a limitation of their freedom for some time now, and probably realized that the entire show their anger to the scheme in a historical context where political, returning to the words of Obama, the whole world look in that direction, would give them greater chance of success. It 'hard to predict how it will end the insurgency now underway in the streets in the short run, but you can predict that ultimately, whether the scheme will retain the logic of repression, his life will not be lasting. And 'in fact unlikely that the events of these days so deflate' enough to replace the country in an apparent status of sleep. Certainly it is equally difficult to believe that the regime has little chance of surviving re-opened once the freedom of press, association and expression, but it is true that if the supreme leader's goal is to maintain a central role in Iranian politics in the years future, can not resist for much longer if not going for a loss. Despite major international leaders are concealed in the national news and not behind the words of impartiality or the maximum sentence for the violence of the Iranian government, it is evident that a fall of the regime would open up a new historical phase in which it would be possible to give a new twist to the stabilization of the Middle Eastern territories. Simply failing to Tehran as an enemy, many things could change in Pakistan, Afghanistan, Iraq, Lebanon, Syria, Palestine and other countries. Western leaders know this well, and despite having had some timid openings also by the government of Ahmadinejad, I gladly would change with another party. The timid convictions arriving in recent days by the U.S. and Europe are not only the result of the new era over Obama, but also determined by the timid side too much for a revolt that will perhaps defeat and followed that with participation would risk too much to burn the progress made so far now with the Iranian government. The balance of power remain so those streets, that's where you store the hope of unraveling the tangle and create a new course if possible, or pick up where you left off.
0 comments:
Post a Comment